"We Have Come to Listen"
Institutions' Rhetoric Put to Test in Tanzania Meetings
by Marjorie Mbilinyi
Tanzania Gender Networking Programme
The
heads of the World Bank and IMF reportedly came to Africa
„to listen.‰ Aha,
listen to whom?
A
peaceful demonstration was organised by local activist NGOs
at the meeting site of the heads of the IMF and the World
Bank and the presidents of ten Eastern and Southern African
countries on Friday, February 23, 2001.
The activists were moved to hold a demonstration
because of the exclusion of civil society organisations in
the talks, and the desire to express their views in as
public a manner as possible. Their main focus was on the
need for total debt cancellation and a different approach to
development. [see earlier press release at www.tgnp.co.tz]
Some of the placards read: „Why do IMF and World Bank rob
the poor to pay the rich?‰; „End debt slavery‰;
„Charges for education and health can only be paid
by James Wolfensohn and Horst Kohler‰; and „We want total debt cancellation‰
The
police used force to stop the demonstration. Three activists
were arrested on the spot, including a staff member of
Tanzania Gender Networking Programme (TGNP), Daudi Kweba,
and two leaders of the National Youth Forum (Gwandumi
Mwakatobe and Lito Kabwe), and bundled into police cars. A
journalist from a major daily newspaper, Mtanzania,
Jackton Manyerere, was severely beaten by police when he
tried to pick up some of the fallen placards. The
chairperson of TGNP, Demere Kitunga, was beaten at Central
Police Station when she arrived to bail out the others, and
later arrested, along with three other members of TGNP. A
total of seven activists were held and interrogated for six
hours, and only released at nightfall after the intervention
of five top human rights lawyers.
On
Saturday, February 24, 2001, the heads of IMF and the World
Bank held a briefing session with the press, the private
sector, donors and civil society organisations, under the
chair of the President of Tanzania, Benjamin Mkapa. The way
in which this meeting was organised illustrated the illusory
nature of democracy within the International Financial
Institutions, and the dependent governments they support,
especially in the light of the previous day‚s police
repression. First of all, the meeting was by invitation
only, with many organisations excluded. The Presidents of
the IMF, the World Bank and Tanzania each spoke briefly.
[The general consensus among activists was that there was
nothing new!] Questions were restricted to the press. The
meeting was cut short after about 30 minutes of questions
and answer, just as activist NGOs were about to raise
questions. Hence, we were duped into attending a glorified
press conference as mere passive spectators, along with
ambassadors from donor countries, United Nations development
agencies, representatives of
„the private sector‰ as well as activist NGOs.
The
explanation for the change in timetable? The visitors had to
be rushed to Ngorongoro Crater Area by air where they would
hold discussions with Ministry of Finance officials! [Ngorongoro
Crater Area is a good example of the growth of
tourist/wildlife industry at the expense of the rights and
welfare of local communities.] However, before their
departure, there was enough time for a cocktail party, with
ample alcoholic beverages and scrumptious bites for a select
few to meet informally with the visiting imperial Heads of
the IMF and World Bank, their local representatives and top
government officials.
During
the meeting, one sympathetic member of the press asked the
IFI heads whether they enjoyed the arrest and brutal
handling of the demonstrators on the previous day.
The head of World Bank cynically replied that given
his experiences elsewhere, „yesterday was a holiday‰. So
much for commitment to „broadbased consultative
processes‰! On the other hand, President Mkapa
replied that the police had erred, that the protesters were
serving the interests of the country, and concluded, „I
assure you that they have a right to express an opinion.‰
Whether this was merely a public relations gesture will
reveal itself later. So far, those arrested are out on bail,
but remain charged with illegal assembly.
The whole exercise calls into question the meaning of
participation and consultation from the perspectives of the
IFIs and their client governments. It reinforces doubts
about prospects of reform from within these institutions,
and the urgent need to build a broad social movement for
change. The arrogance portrayed today by leaders of
institutions and nations is symptomatic of the gap between
them and the people they rule.
|